Legal Opinion

AVANADE, INC. v. City of Seattle

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided July 20, 2009No. 61594-7-IPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

211 P.3d 476 (2009)

AVANADE, INC., Appellant,

v.

CITY OF SEATTLE, Respondent.

No. 61594-7-I.

Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 1.

July 20, 2009.

Scott M. Edwards, Perkins Coie LLP, Seattle, WA, for Appellant.

Kent C. Meyer, Seattle City Attorney's Office, Seattle, WA, for Respondent.

DWYER, A.C.J.

¶ 1 This is a taxation case. The sole issue is whether the City of Seattle used an unlawful method to calculate Business and Occupation (B & O) taxes owed by Avanade, Inc., between January 2000 and June 2004 (the audit period). On cross-motions for summary judgment, the superior court ruled that the…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Complete Auto Transit, Inc. v. BradySupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. Container Corp. of America v. Franchise Tax BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Oklahoma Tax Commission v. Jefferson Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1995
  4. Mobil Oil Corp. v. Commissioner of Taxes of Vt.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. Hans Rees' Sons, Inc. v. North Carolina Ex Rel. MaxwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1931

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Maryland State Comptroller of the Treasury v. WynneCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2013
  2. IGI Resources, Inc. v. City of PascoCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
  3. Wedbush Securities, Inc. v. City of SeattleCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015
  4. PUGET SOUND ENERGY v. City of BellinghamCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2011
  5. Puget Sound Energy, Inc. v. City of Bellingham, Finance DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2011

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API