Legal Opinion
V.L. Rendina, Inc. v. City of Harrisburg
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Decided December 27, 2007No. 130 MAP 2005PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Justice SAYLOR.1
The issues in this case center on whether a municipality may apply its business privilege tax relative to gross receipts from construction work performed within its borders.
Appellee V.L. Rendina, Inc. (“Rendina”) is a Pennsylvania corporation with its principal place of business located in *410Lancaster County. During the years 1999 through 2001, Rendina served as general contractor for the construction of the Keystone Office Building located at the corner of Forster and Sixth Streets in Harrisburg. During the construction project, Rendina leased and maintained a job…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Pennsylvanians Against Gambling Expansion Fund, Inc. v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
- Amerada Hess Corp. v. Director, Division of Taxation, New Jersey Department of the TreasurySupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- F. J. Busse Co. v. PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
- Philadelphia Eagles Football Club, Inc. v. City of PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- Gilberti v. City of PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- S & H Transport, Aplt. v. City of YorkSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
- Williams, L., Aplts v. City of PhilaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
- Giles & Ransome, Inc. v. Whitehall TownshipCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
- Giles & Ransome, Inc. v. Whitehall TownshipCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
- Good Shepherd Rehab. Network, Inc. v. City of AllentownCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2021
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.