Legal Opinion

Dl v. District of Columbia

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided October 23, 2015No. Civil Action No. 2005-1437PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

ROYCE C. LAMBERTH, District Judge

Currently before the Court is the defendants’ Motion to Decertify Subclass 1[467]. The plaintiffs in this case are residents of the District of Columbia and former preschool-age children with various disabilities who allege that the District of Columbia (“the District”) has failed to provide them a free and public education (“FAPE”) in violation of the Individuals with Disabilities Act (“IDEA”). In November 2013, the Court issued a Memorandum Opinion [389] that certified four plaintiff subclasses, the first of which the District presently…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  2. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. DukesSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  3. General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Catherine Evon v. Law Offices of Sidney MickellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
  5. DL v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2013

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. (PC) McClintock v. ValenciaDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2025
  2. Allison Barton, individually and on behalf of others similarly situated v. The Procter & Gamble Company, a Delaware companyDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2026
  3. Borum v. Brentwood Village, LLCDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2019
  4. Borum v. Brentwood Village, LLCDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2019
  5. Lua v. McNettDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API