Legal Opinion

Monroc, Inc. v. Sidwell

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided March 15, 1989No. 870262-CAPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GREENWOOD, Judge:

This case arises out of Timmie Sidwell’s employment as a security guard for Mon-roc, Inc. and the requirement that she reside on Monroe’s property. Monroe initiated an action against Sidwell for unlawful detainer of its premises after Sidwell was terminated from employment, but refused to vacate the premises. Sidwell counterclaimed, claiming Monroe had failed to comply with 29 U.S.C. § 207 of the Fair Labor Standards Act (F.L.S.A.), because it did not compensate her for hours worked in excess of forty hours per week.

Timmie Sidwell was hired by Monroe for two purposes. The…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. Armour & Co. v. WantockSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  3. State v. WalkerUtah Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Von Hake v. ThomasUtah Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Dumas v. KingCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1946

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Aris Vision Institute, Inc. v. Wasatch Property Management, Inc.Court of Appeals of Utah · 2005
  2. Aris Vision Institute, Inc. v. Wasatch Property Management, Inc.Court of Appeals of Utah · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API