Legal Opinion
State v. Lunati
Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee
Decided September 22, 1983PublishedCited by 39 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SCOTT, Judge.
The appellants were indicted along with Tamara L. Caraway in seven separate indictments, charging various offenses relating to prostitution and the possession and exhibition of obscene films. In one case Anthony Ernest Lunati and Ralph P. Luna-ti were charged with maintenance of a house of ill fame, in violation of TCA § 39-6-1001(a)(4). They were acquitted of that charge. In another case the Lunatis and Ms. Caraway were charged with attempting to procure females to become prostitutes in violation of TCA § 39-2-633. The Lunatis were convicted and received sentences of not…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Connally v. General Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Bordenkircher v. HayesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Craig v. BorenSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- State v. MarshallCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1993
- State v. GaylorCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1992
- State v. BoydCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1995
- State v. BurtonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1988
- State v. ScottCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1987
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.