Legal Opinion

Siddens v. Thomas

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided February 10, 1931PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Clay

Affirming.

J. Hardy Thomas brought suit against W. M. Sid-dens to recover on a promissory note for $3,075. He alleged that the note was held by the American National Bank as collateral security for a note which he had executed to the bank. The bank filed an answer and cross-petition setting forth that the note sued on was held as collateral to secure certain indebtedness of Thomas. A special demurrer was sustained to the petition on the ground that Thomas could not maintain the action. Thereafter Thomas satisfied the bank’s claim, and it transferred the note to…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Newberry v. BlatchfordIllinois Supreme Court · 1882
  2. Wadhams v. GayIllinois Supreme Court · 1876
  3. Vertrees' Adm'r v. Newport News, Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1894
  4. Gage v. BaileyIllinois Supreme Court · 1886
  5. Sparr v. Fulton National BankCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1918

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Whallen's Executors v. MooreCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1933
  2. Shell Petroleum Corp. v. ShoreCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1935
  3. Thomas v. SiddensCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1935
  4. Wagner v. SwoopeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API