Legal Opinion

In re Rose

United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Nevada

Decided January 23, 2017No. Case No. 09-33798-MKNPublished

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER ON MOTION TO SET ASIDE VALUATION ORDER1

Honorable Mike K. Nakagawa, United States Bankruptcy Judge

On January 19, 2017, the court heard the Motion to Set Aside Valuation Order (“Motion”) brought by Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. and Wells Fargo Home Mortgage (jointly “Wells Fargo”). (ECF No. 787). Rushmore Loan Management Services, LLC (“Rushmore”) and MTGLQ Investors, LP (“MTGLQ”) joined in the Motion. (ECF No. 831). Opposition was filed by the above-captioned Debtors (“Opposition”). (ECF No. 833), Wells Fargo filed a reply. (ECF No. 877). The appearances of counsel were noted on the record.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Rosenthal v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  2. United States v. Ronald JordanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
  3. Karla SCHIKORE, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant, v. BANKAMERICA SUPPLEMENTAL RETIREMENT PLAN, Defendant-Appellant-Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
  4. In Re Daniel R. Bucknum, Dba Bucknum, Levine & Smith, Debtor. Joe W. Moody, Bernice H. Moody v. Daniel R. Bucknum, Dba Bucknum, Levine & SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
  5. Osborn v. Ricketts (In Re Ricketts)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1987

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API