Legal Opinion

Karla SCHIKORE, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant, v. BANKAMERICA SUPPLEMENTAL RETIREMENT PLAN, Defendant-Appellant-Cross-Appellee

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided October 16, 2001No. 99-16952, 99-17017PublishedCited by 101 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by Judge REINHARDT; Dissent by Judge TASHIMA

REINHARDT, Circuit Judge:

Plaintiff Karla Schikore, a 20-year employee of Bank of America, NT & SA, seeks lump-sum disbursement of retirement benefits she has accrued as a participant in the BankAmerica Supplemental Retirement Plan, an employee benefits plan covered under the ERISA statute. The defendant Plan denied Schikore’s request on the ground that she failed properly to follow the Plan’s payment election procedure. Specifically, the Plan contends that Schikore failed to submit the requisite benefit payment election form one year in…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
  3. Shaw v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Varity Corp. v. HoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  5. Hagner v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by101 opinions

  1. Maria Escobedo v. Apple American GroupCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
  2. Anton Vacek, and Golden Eagle Insurance Company v. United States Postal Service United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
  3. Lisa Lupyan v. Corinthian Colleges IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2014
  4. Payan v. Aramark Management Services Ltd. PartnershipCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
  5. Frank Huizar v. Tom CareyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001

96 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API