Legal Opinion

Atlantic National Bank v. Edmund

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided June 4, 1963No. 40137PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hall, Judge.

The plaintiff complains that the trial court charged the jury to the effect that unless the payee of the check had authorized his wife in writing to indorse the check for him, the Bank would not be a holder in due course.

Generally, the authority delegated to an agent must be conferred upon him with the same degree of formality as is required of the agent in the execution of the powers delegated. Code § 4-105; Byrd v. Piha, 165 Ga. 397 (2) (141 SE 48). It is also true that under the Negotiable Instruments Law an indorsement must be written on the instrument itself or upon a paper…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Byrd v. PihaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1927
  2. Connor v. HodgesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1910
  3. Taylor v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1916
  4. Citizens & Southern National Bank v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1958
  5. Foster v. CochranSupreme Court of Georgia · 1892

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Dal-Tile Corp. v. Cash N' Go, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
  2. Dal-Tile Corp. v. Cash N' Go, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API