Legal Opinion

Connor v. Hodges

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided December 10, 1910No. 2006, 2007PublishedCited by 22 opinions

Complaint; from city court of Springfield — Judge Smith. May 17, 1910.

1Opinion of the CourtRussell, J.

1. The motion to dismiss the writ of error is not well taken. An acknowledgment of service of a bill of exceptions by counsel, signing' as “attorney for defendants in error,” will be presumed to include all of the defendants in error named in the bill of exceptions. Where there are several defendants in error, and counsel, in signing the acknowledgment of service of the bill of exceptions, does not specify by name those whom he represents, and it is not ma.de to appear that he was not authorized to represent a particular party to the cause, his authority" to acknowledge service for all of the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ridley v. HightowerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
  2. Pergason v. EtchersonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1893
  3. Carter v. Smith & SonsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1909

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Edwards v. WallSupreme Court of Georgia · 1922
  2. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. ClarkeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939
  3. Schillinger v. WickershamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1917
  4. Wells v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1963
  5. Peachtree Roxboro Corp. v. United States Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1960

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API