Taylor v. Johnson
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Complaint; from city court of Hall county — Judge Wheeler. May 30, 1915.
1Opinion of the CourtBroyles, J.
1. A plea of non est faetum, to a suit on promissory notes, is subject to be stricken, when it does not unequivocally deny that the notes sued on are the act and deed of the defendant. Thomas v. Siesel, 2 Ga. App. 663 (4), 665 (58 S. E. 1131).
*162Decided May 24, 1916. Complaint; from city court of Hall county — Judge Wheeler. May 30, 1915. JE,. D. Kenyon, G. N. Davie, for plaintiff in error. A. H. Henderson, W. M. Johnson, contra.
2. The law does not require that an agent’s authority to execute a promissory note in the name of his principal shall be in writing. Foster v. Cochran, 89 Ga. 466 (15 S.…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Thomas & McCafferty v. SieselCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
- Foster v. CochranSupreme Court of Georgia · 1892
3Cited by9 opinions
- Bearden v. LaneCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1963
- Trapnell v. BirdCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1917
- Collins v. Strickland Bros.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1918
- Lancaster v. RalstonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1938
- McDonald & Griffin v. HortonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1917
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.