Legal Opinion

People v. Quinn

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 30, 1936No. Crim. 2828PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WHITE, J., pro tem.

Appellant was charged by an information in three counts with violation of sections 288 and 288a of the Penal Code. He was acquitted of the offenses charged in counts 2 and 3, and convicted by the jury as to count 1, which charged a violation of section 288 of the Penal Code. Prom the order denying his motion for a new trial and from the judgment pronounced against him, appellant prosecutes this appeal.

A reversal is urged upon the single ground of the insufficiency of the evidence to support the verdict. The victim of defendant’s alleged felonious assault was a girl of the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. PhelanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Clark v. Tulare Lake Dredging Co.California Court of Appeal · 1910
  3. People v. WrightCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1907
  4. People v. TurpinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1909

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. People v. HouserCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  2. People v. HarrisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  3. People v. CarlsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
  4. People v. RallsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
  5. People v. JacksonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API