Legal Opinion
Lasich v. Wimpenney
Wyoming Supreme Court
Decided January 18, 1955No. 2634 and 2638PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Riner, Chief Justice
CASE NO. 2634
The plaintiff and appellant, George Lasich, is hereinafter usually designated “appellant” or by his surname, Lasich. The respondent, Clarence Wimpenney, will also be usually referred to herein as aligned in this court or by his surname, Wimpenney.
Lasich as principal contractor undertook to erect a dwelling house on a certain lot in Riverton, Wyoming. This lot was owned by Wimpenney, and the dwelling house aforesaid was built by Lasich for the owner. It developed that Lasich was not so situated financially as to enable him to construct this building in…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Jacoby v. City of GilletteWyoming Supreme Court · 1946
- Davis v. AlvordSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Kinney-Coastal Oil Co. v. KiefferSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Sheffield Furnace Co. v. WitherowSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Christensen v. McCann Et Ux.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1929
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- True v. Hi-Plains Elevator MacHinery, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1978
- Downs v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1978
- Dame v. MileskiWyoming Supreme Court · 1959
- Severin v. HayesWyoming Supreme Court · 1962
- Shepard v. BeckWyoming Supreme Court · 2007
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.