D. J. Bielzoff Products Co. v. James B. Beam Distilling Co.
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Robson
D. J. Bielzoff Products Co., plaintiff, filed its action of forcible entry and detainer against James B. Beam Distilling Co. and Triangle Sign Co., Inc., defendants, to secure possession of a portion of the exterior wall of a building at 400 North Rush street, Chicago, Illinois. The facts were stipulated and the trial court found that the defendants unlawfully withheld possession of the wall by painting and maintaining a sign thereon and entered judgment for the plaintiff. Defendants appeal.
The principal question presented by this appeal is whether the plaintiff, the lessee of two interior…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Lowell v. StrahanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1887
- Reynolds v. . Van BeurenNew York Court of Appeals · 1898
- Holladay v. Chicago Arc Light & Power Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1894
- Monson v. KillIllinois Supreme Court · 1898
- Burns v. NashAppellate Court of Illinois · 1887
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Redfern v. SullivanAppellate Court of Illinois · 1983
- City of Chicago v. Airline Canteen Service, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1978
- Bleck v. CosgroveAppellate Court of Illinois · 1961
- Triangle Sign Co. v. Randolph & State Property, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1958
- Worley v. EhretAppellate Court of Illinois · 1976
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.