Legal Opinion

Worley v. Ehret

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided January 22, 1976No. 75-239PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Jones

This case and the companion case of Worley v. Jansen, 36 Ill.App.3d 60, 343 N.E.2d 246, arise out of the same or closely related facts. The issues in the two cases are substantially the same and oral argument was consolidated. Therefore, although separate opinions are being filed in the two cases, the discussion of the facts and the issues as set out herein will be applicable, except where noted otherwise, to the opinion in Worley v. Jansen.

Plaintiff, Donald L. Worley, brought a forcible entry and detainer action against defendant, Grace Ehret, because of her occupancy of a portion of land…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Jack Spring, Inc. v. LittleIllinois Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Rosewood Corp. v. FisherIllinois Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Bleck v. CosgroveAppellate Court of Illinois · 1961
  4. Breit v. YeatonIllinois Supreme Court · 1881
  5. Nogle v. NogleAppellate Court of Illinois · 1964

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Pillsbury Co. v. Midland Enterprises, Inc.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1989
  2. Milford v. Tenn. River Pulp & Paper Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1978
  3. M.M. & G., Inc. v. JacksonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
  4. Beckham v. TateAppellate Court of Illinois · 1978
  5. Fouser v. PaigeIdaho Supreme Court · 1980

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API