Albin v. Bakas
New Mexico Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
VIGIL, Judge.
{1} The issue presented in this case is whether state police officers who seize cash under the authority of the Controlled Substances Act, NMSA 1978, §§ 30-31-1 to -41 (1972, as amended through 2006), are required to comply with the requirements of the Forfeiture Act, NMSA 1978, §§ 31-27-1 to -8 (2002), or whether they may instead transfer the cash to the federal government to bring a forfeiture action under federal law, then receive from the federal government a portion of the proceeds. We conclude that compliance with the Forfeiture Act is mandatory and reverse the…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Penn Central Casualty Co. v. Pennsylvania Ex Rel. SchnaderSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- State v. SmithNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2004
- State v. NunezNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1999
- Jeffrey M. Scarabin v. Drug Enforcement AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992
- United States v. One 1979 Chevrolet C-20 Van, and Elizabeth Anderson, Claimant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Harris v. Mayfield Hts.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2013
- State v. BenallyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2016
- State v. BenallyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2016
- State v. MadrigalNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2015
- State v. MadrigalNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2015