Legal Opinion

State v. Benally

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided February 25, 2016No. 35,145PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

NAKAMURA, Justice.

{1} In this case, we hold that when law enforcement officers seized, impounded, and sealed a vehicle, under NMSA 1978, Section 31-27-5(A) (2002, amended 2015), they “ma[de] a seizure” of the currency that the vehicle contained. On June 23, 2011, Gallup police officers seized a vehicle. On June 29, they executed a warrant to search the vehicle and discovered $1295 in currency. The State filed a forfeiture complaint for the $1295 on July 27, which was within thirty days of the search but not within thirty days of the seizure of the vehicle. A provision of the Forfeiture…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. United States v. PlaceSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. United States v. JacobsenSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Horton v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  4. Soldal v. Cook CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  5. State v. NunezNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1999

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. BenallyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API