Legal Opinion

Bank of Seoul & Trust Co. v. Marcione

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 1, 1988No. B028692PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

HANSON, J.

Introduction

Plaintiff Bank of Seoul and Trust Company appeals from an order sustaining the demurrer of defendants Conrad C., Lillian B., Eugene, and Geraldina Marcione without leave to amend and dismissing the first amended complaint. We reverse.

Standard of Review

In testing a complaint, a demurrer admits all material and issuable facts properly pleaded. However, it does not admit contentions, deductions, or conclusions of fact or law in the complaint. (Daar v. Yellow Cab Co. (1967) 67 Cal.2d 695, 713 [63 Cal.Rptr. 724, 433 P.2d 732]; Serrano v. Priest (1971) 5 Cal.3d 584, 591…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Gruenberg v. Aetna InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Serrano v. PriestCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Daar v. Yellow Cab Co.California Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Garfinkle v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Sargent v. ShumakerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Biancalana v. T.D. Service Co.California Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Hatch v. CollinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
  3. Millennium Rock Mortgage, Inc. v. T.D. Service Co.California Court of Appeal · 2009
  4. Ostayan v. Serrano Reconveyance CompanyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
  5. In Re Debtor: Ashley Susan AaronsDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2023

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API