Legal Opinion

Woodlief v. Mecklenburg County

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided February 21, 2006No. COA05-564PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TYSON, Judge.

John B. Woodlief and Cynthia M. Woodlief (“plaintiffs”) appeal from the trial court’s 17 December 2004 order granting summary judgment in favor of Mecklenburg County, the City of Charlotte, the Charlotte Zoning Board of Adjustment, Insite Engineering and Surveying, PLLC, E.C. Griffith Company, Dorsett Hitchens Properties, LLC, and Joel Madden (collectively, “defendants”). We affirm.

I. Background

Plaintiffs are the owners of a parcel of land used for residential purposes located in Charlotte. Defendant, E.C. Griffith Company (“Griffith”), owns approximately 6.4 acres of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Price v. DavisCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999
  2. Whiteco Outdoor Advertising v. Johnston County Board of AdjustmentCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999
  3. MacPherson v. City of AshevilleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
  4. Hines v. YatesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
  5. Cogdell v. TaylorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Robins v. Town of HillsboroughCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2006
  2. Brookline Residential, LLC v. City of CharlotteCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2017
  3. Robins v. Town of HillsboroughCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2006
  4. Woodlief v. Mecklenburg CountyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API