Legal Opinion
Woodlief v. Mecklenburg County
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
Decided February 21, 2006No. COA05-564Published
1Opinion of the Court
625 S.E.2d 904 (2006)
John B. WOODLIEF and wife, Cynthia M. Woodlief, Plaintiffs,
v.
MECKLENBURG COUNTY, a body politic and corporate of the State of North Carolina, City of Charlotte, a municipal corporation of the State of North Carolina, Charlotte Zoning Board of Adjustment, Insite Engineering and Surveying, PLLC, E.C. Griffith Company, Dorsett Hitchens Properties, LLC, and Joel Madden, Defendants.
No. COA05-564.
Court of Appeals of North Carolina.
February 21, 2006.
Smith Moore, L.L.P., by Thomas E. Terrell, Jr. and Laurie D. Clark, Greensboro, for plaintiffs-appellants.
Charlotte City Attorney,…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Price v. DavisCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999
- Whiteco Outdoor Advertising v. Johnston County Board of AdjustmentCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999
- MacPherson v. City of AshevilleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
- Hines v. YatesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
- Cogdell v. TaylorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.