Legal Opinion
Koebel v. Coe
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided June 12, 1939No. 7225PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
EDGERTON, Associate Justice.
This is an appeal from a decree dismissing a bill under R.S. § 4915 (35 U.S.C. § 63) to obtain a patent on a setting for diamonds for industrial uses such as cutting, drilling and grinding. The invention ■ has had an immense success. The disputed claim is: “7. As a new article of manufacture, a setting for diamonds consisting of a base metal alloy the principal ingredients, of which are molybdenum, copper and cobalt so proportioned as to be capable of being sintered at a temperature below that of the critical point at which the desirable qualities of the diamond…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Morgan v. DanielsSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- General Electric Co. v. Wabash Appliance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Radio Corp. of America v. Radio Engineering Laboratories, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Holland Furniture Co. v. Perkins Glue Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Dowling v. JonesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1933
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- General Electric Co. v. Hygrade Sylvania CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1944
- Application of ShortellCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1949
- Monsanto Chemical Co. v. CoeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1944
- In re JollyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1949
- Minnesota Mining & Mfg. Co. v. CoeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1940
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.