Minnesota Mining & Mfg. Co. v. Coe
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
RUTLEDGE, Associate Justice.
The appeal is from a judgment of the District Court dismissing the complaint as to certain of plaintiff’s claims in an action to authorize the Commissioner of Patents to issue a patent.1 The trial court authorized the issuance of a patent as to two of the claims, and the Commissioner does not appeal from this ruling.
The claims relate to a “sandblast stencil.” This is a sheet of material which is affixed to the surface of a stone in which letters or- figures are to be cut. The stencil is cut to form the letters or figures desired. The engraver uses a gun which…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- General Electric Co. v. Wabash Appliance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Koebel v. CoeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1939
3Cited by2 opinions
- Monsanto Chemical Co. v. CoeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1944
- Houghton v. OomsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1946