Legal Opinion

Minnesota Mining & Mfg. Co. v. Coe

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided May 6, 1940No. 7390PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RUTLEDGE, Associate Justice.

The appeal is from a judgment of the District Court dismissing the complaint as to certain of plaintiff’s claims in an action to authorize the Commissioner of Patents to issue a patent.1 The trial court authorized the issuance of a patent as to two of the claims, and the Commissioner does not appeal from this ruling.

The claims relate to a “sandblast stencil.” This is a sheet of material which is affixed to the surface of a stone in which letters or- figures are to be cut. The stencil is cut to form the letters or figures desired. The engraver uses a gun which…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. General Electric Co. v. Wabash Appliance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Koebel v. CoeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1939

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Monsanto Chemical Co. v. CoeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1944
  2. Houghton v. OomsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API