Hazell v. Servomation Corp.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
WIEAND, Judge:
This is an appeal from a judgment entered following a non-jury trial which resulted in a verdict for appellee in his action to recover commissions earned pursuant to a compensation agreement. At issue is how much of a guaranteed annual draw is to be deducted from commissions to determine the net compensation to which an employee is entitled *467upon termination of his employment. The court en banc held that only a pro-rated portion was deductible from earned commissions in order to determine compensation at the time of terminating employment. We agree and affirm.
Herbert E. Hazell,…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Unit Vending Corp. v. LacasSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
- Betterman v. American Stores Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
- Wilkes-Barre Township School District v. CorganSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
- Consolidated Tile & Slate Co. v. FoxSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
- Heidt v. Aughenbaugh Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Fleck v. Durawood Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Zerodec MegaCorp. v. Terstep of Texas, Inc. (In Re Zerodec MegaCorp.)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1986