Legal Opinion

Walker v. Boston & Maine Railroad

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided April 1, 1902PublishedCited by 21 opinions

Case, for personal injuries. Trial by jury and verdict for tlie plaintiff. Transferred from the April term, 1901, of the superior court by Young, J. The plaintiff claimed that she was injured by the sudden starting of the train on which she was a passenger, as she was leaving a car. Her evidence tended to prove that she and her sister attempted to leave the car within a reasonable time after the train stopped.

Read the full summary

Case, for personal injuries. Trial by jury and verdict for tlie plaintiff. Transferred from the April term, 1901, of the superior court by Young, J. The plaintiff claimed that she was injured by the sudden starting of the train on which she was a passenger, as she was leaving a car. Her evidence tended to prove that she and her sister attempted to leave the car within a reasonable time after the train stopped. On cross-examination the sister testified that as she stepped from the car she heard some one say: “ You started without orders; you’ll hear from tins.” This remark was not responsive…

1Opinion of the CourtParsons, J.

The requested instruction was, so far as applicable to the evidence, covered by the instructions given. Upon the question of damages for future physical and mental pain, the jury were limited by the instructions given to such suffering as was shown to be the direct, natural, and probable result of the defendants’ fault. When the legal principle governing a case is fully stated in general terms, it is not error of law for the court to refuse instructions upon its application to particular evidence. The substance of the requested charge having been given, it is no ground of exception that it…

2Cited by21 opinions

  1. Fehely v. SendersOregon Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Indianapolis Street Railway Co. v. RayIndiana Supreme Court · 1906
  3. Smith v. Boston & Maine RailroadSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1935
  4. Halloran v. New England Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1921
  5. Colby v. LeeSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1928

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API