Legal Opinion

Aust v. Phoenix, City of

District Court, D. Arizona

Decided April 3, 2025No. 2:24-cv-03410Unknown

1Opinion

1 KM 2 WO 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 Michael Charles Aust, No. CV-24-03410-PHX-JAT (ESW) 10 Plaintiff, 11 v. ORDER 12 City of Phoenix, et al., 13 Defendants. 14 15 Plaintiff Michael Charles Aust,1 who is not confined, has filed a civil rights 16 Complaint (Doc. 1) and an Application to Proceed in District Without Prepaying Fees or 17 Costs (Doc. 2). The Court will dismiss the Complaint with leave to amend. 18 I. Application to Proceed 19 The Court will grant Plaintiff’s Application to Proceed in District Court Without 20 Prepaying Fees or…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API