Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Pinkenson

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 22, 1939No. Appeals, 244-246, 249-251PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Cunningham, J.,

These appellants, Jack H. Pinkenson and Harry S. Gilgore, were jointly indicted and tried along with John Williams, Alexander Commers, William Braver-man and Daniel Gilhool at No. 116 August Sessions, 1938, of the court below for having on August 4, 1938, committed various violations of the Act of May 22, 1895, P. L. 99, 18 PS §1461, which may be described in general terms as pool-selling and book-making, occupying part of a building for receiving and paying bets on the results of horse races, setting up and establishing a gaming house and gambling devices, etc. A…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. DrumSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1868
  2. Commonwealth v. KluskaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  3. Commonwealth v. WilcoxSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  4. Commonwealth v. WilcoxSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
  5. Commonwealth v. CarrSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1939

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Selden, Admr. v. Metro. Life Ins. Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
  2. Commonwealth v. PalaceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
  3. United States ex rel. Brown v. RussellDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API