Legal Opinion

Rogge v. Petroleum County

Montana Supreme Court

Decided May 31, 1938No. 7,788PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Angstman

Plaintiff, as a resident taxpayer of Petroleum county, brought this action in his own behalf and on behalf of all other taxpayers of the county to enjoin the collection of a tax levy of twenty mills for a bond sinking and interest fund. His claim is that the tax levy was and is illegal.

Upon the filing of the complaint, an order to show cause and restraining order was issued. Defendants thereafter filed a motion to quash the restraining order, and an answer to the complaint. The cause was heard before the court without a jury. The court dissolved the restraining order and entered judgment in…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Bracher v. MillardIllinois Supreme Court · 1923
  2. People ex rel. Browne v. Chicago & Eastern Illinois Railway Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1923
  3. State Ex Rel. Tillman v. District CourtMontana Supreme Court · 1936
  4. El Reno Wholesale Grocery Co. v. TaylorSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
  5. First National Bank v. Sanders CountyMontana Supreme Court · 1929

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Cochise County v. Southern Pacific CompanyArizona Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Cochise County v. Southern Pacific Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1965
  3. Cochise County v. Southern Pacific Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Opinion No., Texas Attorney General Reports1984
  5. Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion, Texas Attorney General Reports1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API