Legal Opinion · Dissent

Cochise County v. Southern Pacific Co.

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided January 12, 1966No. 8662-PRPublished

1Dissent

BERNSTEIN, Vice Chief Justice

(dissenting) .

I regret that I must dissent. I respectfully submit the majority opinion proceeds upon the erroneous premise that the Board of Equalization acted judicially in carrying out its tax power and therefore cannot be attacked in the absence of showing that it acted in bad faith or so arbitrarily as to amount to constructive fraud. The majority states the issue to be whether the Board has abused its discretion. The correct issue is whether the Board has any discretion.

The majority opinion holds that a public official can violate the mandatory provisions of…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Wilbur v. United States Ex Rel. KadrieSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  2. Bowman v. County of LakeIllinois Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Montana National Bank v. Yellowstone County of MontanaSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  4. Southern Pacific Company v. Cochise CountyArizona Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Shaw v. Gibson-Zahniser Oil Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1928

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API