Legal Opinion

Opinion No.

Texas Attorney General Reports

Decided April 11, 1984Published

1Opinion of the Court

Honorable Luther Jones El Paso County Attorney Room 201, City-County Building El Paso, Texas 79901

Re: Whether a water district may use excess bond monies levied for the interest and sinking fund for a water project not described in the bond issue

Dear Mr. Jones:

You ask us the following question:

Can a water district use the proceeds of a bond issue passed pursuant to an act of the Thirty-ninth Legislature, chapter 25, 1925, for water projects other than the project described in the original bond issue?

We understand you to ask whether the district can expend surplus monies levied for the…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Ex Parte RoloffTexas Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Rothschild v. Village of Calumet ParkIllinois Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Bexar County Hospital District v. CrosbyTexas Supreme Court · 1959
  4. State v. Board of Public InstructionSupreme Court of Florida · 1936
  5. East St. Louis & Treasurer of East St. Louis v. United States Ex Rel. ZebleySupreme Court of the United States · 1884

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API