Legal Opinion

United States v. Wright

District Court, D. Kansas

Decided September 19, 2000No. 00-40024-02-SAC, 00-40024-3-SAC, 00-40024-06-SAC and 00-40024-10-SACPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

CROW, Senior District Judge.

The case comes before the court on the defendant Rhonda Hibbard’s Motion to Compel Production of Progress Reports and Daily Logs (Dk.275); the defendant Timothy Jay Cline’s Motion to Join (Dk.276); the defendant Tracy D. Wright’s Motion to Join (Dk.282); and the defendant Charles William Hopkins’ Motion to Join (Dk.298). The government has filed a consolidated response opposing the motion to compel production of the requested reports and logs. (Dk.288). On September 6, 2000, the court heard oral argument on these motions. With the additional…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Alderman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Scott v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. United States v. John CapraCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
  4. United States v. AngiuloCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1988
  5. United States v. Alphonse CirilloCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. United States v. ChimeraDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2001
  2. United States v. PrayDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
  3. United States v. McCaffertyDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2011
  4. United States v. RoybalDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2014
  5. United States v. FrancoDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2008

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API