Legal Opinion
United States v. Pray
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided September 3, 2010No. Criminal Action 10-51 (RMC)PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
ROSEMARY M. COLLYER, District Judge.
Mark Pray (1), Kenneth Benbow (2), Randolph Danson (3), Alonzo Marlow (4), Robert McMillan (6), Timothy Moon (7), Charles Wade (10), Herman Williams (12), and Larry Williams (13) (collectively “Defendants”) seek production of the periodic reports written by the prosecutors and provided to Judge Ricardo Urbina, who presided over the Title III wiretaps obtained by the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the investigation of this case. Periodic reports assist a wiretap-authorizing court in determining what progress has been made in a criminal…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- United States v. Raffi Nakashian, A/K/A "Ralfi,"Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
- United States v. VastolaDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1987
- United States v. LibbyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2006
- United States v. NakashianDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1986
- United States v. MarchmanDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1975
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- United States v. ApodacaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2017
- United States v. McCaffertyDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2011
- United States v. RoybalDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2014
- United States v. ApodacaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017