Legal Opinion

In Re Estate of Herbert

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided April 15, 1999No. 16291PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

RAMIL, J.

We granted petitioner-proponent-appellant Hanno Soth’s application for a writ of certio-rari with respect to the Intermediate Court of Appeals’ (ICA) decision in In re Estate of Herbert, No. 16291, slip op., 1997 WL 123563 (Ct.App.Haw. March 18, 1997).

It is apparent from the arguments of the parties and the ICA’s decision that the bulk of our case law regarding the relevant law of wills is nearly a century old. We take this opportunity to clarify and affirm the antiquated body of the Hawaii law of wills and the principles established therein. With particular…

2Cases cited53 opinions

  1. State v. ArceoHawaii Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Kealoha v. County of HawaiiHawaii Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Craft v. PeeblesHawaii Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Richardson v. Sport Shinko (Waikiki Corp.)Hawaii Supreme Court · 1994
  5. State Ex Rel. Bronster v. United States Steel Corp.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1996

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Schefke v. Reliable Collection Agency, Ltd.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2001
  2. State v. MosesHawaii Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Gonsalves v. Nissan Motor Corp. in Hawai'i, Ltd.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Bank of Hawaii v. KunimotoHawaii Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Nelson v. University of Hawai'iHawaii Supreme Court · 2001

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API