Legal Opinion

(PC) Boddie v. Martel

District Court, E.D. California

Decided March 9, 2020No. 2:18-cv-01196Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ALEXANDER BODDIE, No. 2:18-cv-1196 AC P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 MICHAEL MARTEL, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, seeks relief pursuant to

42 U.S.C. § 1983

and 18 has requested authority pursuant to

28 U.S.C. § 1915

to proceed in forma pauperis. ECF Nos. 1, 19 2, 5, 6). This proceeding was referred to this court by Local Rule 302 pursuant to

28 U.S.C. § 20

636(b)(1)(B). 21 I. IN FORMA PAUPERIS APPLICATION 22 Plaintiff has submitted a declaration that makes the…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  4. Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. West v. AtkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1988

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API