Schmitt v. Schmitt

McEVERS, Justice.

[¶ 1] Cody Schmitt, a self-represented litigant, appeals from, a district court’s Eviction Order, arguing service of the amended notice of eviction was insufficient. Having no transcript to review of the district court’s evidentiary hearing, we conclude the district court’s finding that service of the notice of termination was proper is not clearly erroneous. We affirm.

I

[¶ 2] Cody Schmitt and Lisa Stahlberg resided in a mobile home located on property owned by Rodney and Pamela Schmitt. Stahlberg resided on the property since April 25, 2018, and Schmitt resided on the…