Legal Opinion

Anderson v. Heinze

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided April 16, 2002No. 20010127PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KAPSNER, Justice.

[¶ 1] Kenneth C. Heinze has appealed a judgment entered in an eviction action brought by Rosalia Anderson and Gary Jorisson. We conclude Heinze had no right of possession after expiration of his lease and the trial court properly ordered him to vacate the leased premises or be evicted. We affirm.

I

[¶ 2] On February 1, 2000, Donald Anderson and Heinze executed an agreement by which Anderson leased farmland to Heinze “for and during the full term of one year from and after 1 February, 2000, and terminating 1 February.” The lease provided, in part:

This lease is subject to expire…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Berry-Iverson Co. of North Dakota, Inc. v. JohnsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Murchison v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Flex Credit, Inc. v. WinkowitschNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Stonewood Hotel Corp. v. Davis Development, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Weintz v. BumgarnerMontana Supreme Court · 1967

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Nelson v. JohnsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
  2. VND, LLC v. Leevers Foods, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Haugenoe v. BambrickNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Riverwood Commercial Park, LLC v. Standard Oil Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Lawrence v. DelkampNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API