Legal Opinion

First Nat. Bank of Dalton v. Cummings

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided March 26, 1918No. 8712PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Error from District Court, Major County; •Tames B. Oullison, Judge. Action by the First National Bank of Dalton, Ohio, against William L. Cummings. Judgment for defendant, and plain- • tiff brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

COLLIER, C.

This is an action brought by the plaintiff in error, hereinafter styled plaintiff, against the defendant in error, hereinafter styled defendant, and other persons who were not served, to recover upon a promissory note, which said note, and the indorsement thereon is as follows, to wit:

“$400.00. Togo, Okla., Nov. 25; 1909. June 7, 1911, after date, for value received, we jointly and severally promise to pay to Clyde EJ. Rudy or order four hundred and no/100 at the Oleo State Bank, with interest at 8 per cent, per annum, interest payable annually from date.
“Oscar G. Peck.
“Wi…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Kellogg v. Douglas County BankSupreme Court of Kansas · 1897
  2. Maddox v. DuncanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1898
  3. Hendrix v. Bauhard Bros.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1912
  4. Robinson v. LairSupreme Court of Iowa · 1870
  5. Dunham v. PetersonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1896

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Cady v. Bay City Land Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Delk v. City Nat. Bank of DuncanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
  3. Adolph Ramish, Inc. v. WoodruffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Hutson v. RankinIdaho Supreme Court · 1922
  5. National Bank of the Republic v. PriceUtah Supreme Court · 1923

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API