Legal Opinion

Howell v. Deady

District Court, D. Oregon

Decided May 19, 1941No. E—9641PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

JAMES ALGER FEE, District Judge.

Some confusion has arisen in the minds of counsel over the interpretation of the will by the court, in the opinion on motion to dismiss. A recrystallization of the decision may, therefore, be of moment.

The court held, taking the will by its four corners, that the clear intention of the testatrix was, first to give two-thirds of the real property in fee simple to her son, Henderson Brooke Deady, and one-third jointly, by like title, to her grandsons, Hanover and Matthew Edward Deady; and second, to control the disposition of the income from the whole property…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Closset v. BurtchaellOregon Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Schramm v. BurkhartOregon Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Hansen v. Oregon Humane SocietyOregon Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Stubbs v. AbelOregon Supreme Court · 1925
  5. Holman v. LutzOregon Supreme Court · 1929

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Howell v. DeadyDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API