Legal Opinion

Holman v. Lutz

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided October 24, 1929PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] In Banc. This is a suit commenced by the plaintiffs for the purpose of enforcing the specific performance of an alleged contract. It is alleged that on the 5th day of December, 1914, and for a long time prior thereto, Edward Holman and Julia Holman were husband and wife, and that they continued to be husband and wife until the 3d day of December, 1920, when Edward Holman died; that Walter Jervis Holman and Guy Edward Holman were sons of Edward Holman by a former…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Edson v. . ParsonsNew York Court of Appeals · 1898
  2. Frazier v. PattersonIllinois Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Wallace v. . WallaceNew York Court of Appeals · 1915
  4. Hermann v. LudwigAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1919
  5. Bower v. DanielSupreme Court of Missouri · 1906

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. State v. EndsleyOregon Supreme Court · 1958
  2. STATE Ex Rel MADDEN v. CRAWFORDOregon Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Schramm v. BurkhartOregon Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Taylor v. WaitOregon Supreme Court · 1932
  5. Carey v. Lincoln Loan Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2005

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API