Campbell v. Secretary of Health & Human Services
United States Court of Federal Claims
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ALLEGRA, Judge.
Taylor Marie Campbell and her parents seek review of a decision rejecting their vaccine injury claims under the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-10 et seq. (the Vaccine Act). Because the court concludes that the procedures employed by the Special Master were fundamentally unfair, and that her rulings are either inadequately explained or arbitrary and capricious, it remands this matter for further proceedings.
I. Background
The facts necessary to this ruling relate primarily to the procedures employed below and briefly are stated…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by265 opinions
- Shapiro v. Secretary of Health & Human ServicesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
- Gerritsen v. Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2015
- Davis v. Secretary of Health & Human ServicesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
- Hazlehurst v. Secretary, Department of Health & Human ServicesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
- Crispin v. Christian Audigier, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2010
260 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.