Wilson v. Martin
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from an order of the superior court for Lincoln county, Warren, L, entered July 20, 1905, upon the er parte application of the plaintiff, dismissing, without prejudice, an action by the receiver of a bank to recover an assessment on capital stock.
1Opinion of the CourtBudkin, J.
This action was brought by the plaintiff, as receiver of the Big Bend National Bank, tO' recover an assessment of $100 pier share on thirty shares of the capital, stock of the association owned by the defendant. The answer, in addition to denials, contained three affirmative defenses or counterclaims. Tjhe substance of these defenses or counterclaims was as follows: (1) Fraudulent representations made by the officers of the bank in the sale of the stock to the defendant; (2) that the entire capital stock of the bank had been subscribed and issued prior to the issuance of the thirty shares…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Rhode Island Mortgage & Trust Co. v. City of SpokaneWashington Supreme Court · 1898
- State ex rel. Norris v. District Court First Judicial DistrictSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
- Pacific Supply Co. v. BrandWashington Supreme Court · 1893
- Hall v. SkavdaleWashington Supreme Court · 1899
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. O'NealWashington Supreme Court · 1928
- Baldwin v. AndersonIdaho Supreme Court · 1932