Legal Opinion

Miko v. Feldman

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided November 29, 1935PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Perskie, J.

This appeal brings up for review a judgment of the District Court of the First Judicial District of the county of Hudson. It is based on a verdict of the trial judge, sitting without a jury, in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendant below, in the sum of $459.40 and $27.17 costs.

Plaintiff sued the defendant, Feldman, on a note originally in the sum of $1,500 and reduced by successive renewals to $459.40. It was signed by the defendant and made payable to the order of Nathan Hiller and was discounted by the latter at the Weehawken…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. The Coast National Bank v. BloomSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1934
  2. Feldman v. Jacob Branfman & Son, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1933
  3. Schmid v. HainesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1935
  4. Breitbart v. LurichSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1923
  5. Robertson v. BursteinSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1929

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Gabriel v. Borough of ParamusSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1965
  2. Brawer Bros. v. DeGise Silk Dyeing Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1930
  3. Gabriel v. Borough of ParamusSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API