Legal Opinion

Washington, Dana Wayne v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)

Decided October 30, 2003No. 01-02-00926-CRPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

TIM TAFT, Justice.

A jury found appellant, Dana Wayne Washington, guilty of aggravated sexual assault and assessed punishment at 36 years in prison. Appellant appealed that conviction to this Court, and we reversed the judgment and remanded the cause for a new trial. 1 See Washington v. State, 16 S.W.3d 70 (Tex.App.-Houston [1st Dist.] 2000, pet. ref’d). At the second trial, appellant was again found guilty by a jury, but elected to have his punishment assessed by the court, rather than by the jury. The trial court found enhancement allegations of prior convictions for delivery of…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Johnson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2000
  3. Clewis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1996
  4. Cain v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
  5. King v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2000

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Dominguez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2003
  2. Washington v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2004
  3. Bobby Joe Evens v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2015
  4. Dominguez, Carlos Martinez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2003
  5. Fred Douglas Moore, Jr. v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2015

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API