Legal Opinion

Spaulding v. Burke

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 31, 1903No. 4781PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Tallman, J., entered January 22, 1903, upon findings in favor of the plaintiff, after a trial upon the merits before the court without a jury, foreclosing a mechanics’ lien.

1Opinion of the CourtHadley, J.

The respondent brought this suit against appellants to foreclose an alleged lien upon certain real estate belonging to appellants Burke and wife. The claim of lien is based upon the alleged services of respondent as an architect in preparing plans and specifications for a building to he erected upon the said real estate, and in superintending the construction thereof as the architect in charge. A written agreement was entered into, signed by appellant E. C. Burke and respondent, whereby, in consideration of the sum of $1,500 to he paid by said Burke, the respondent agreed to furnish the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Moran Bros. v. Northern Pacific RailroadWashington Supreme Court · 1898

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Gould v. McCormickWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Columbia Lumber Co. v. BushWashington Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Johnson v. IrwinWashington Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Gray v. HickeyWashington Supreme Court · 1917
  5. A.A.C. Corp. v. ReedCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1971

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API