Legal Opinion

DiDomenico v.Valentino

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided December 14, 2012No. 11 MA 175PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

[Cite as DiDomenico v.Valentino,

2012-Ohio-5992.] STATE OF OHIO, MAHONING COUNTY IN THE COURT OF APPEALS SEVENTH DISTRICT JOSEPH DiDOMENICO, et al. ) CASE NO. 11 MA 175 ) PLAINTIFFS-APPELLEES ) ) VS. ) OPINION ) JOHN VALENTINO, et al. ) ) DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS ) CHARACTER OF PROCEEDINGS: Civil Appeal from the Area County Court No. 4 of Mahoning County, Ohio Case No. 2007 CVF 01478 JUDGMENT: Vacated. APPEARANCES: For Plaintiffs-Appellees: Atty. Scott R. Cochran 19 East Front Street Youngstown, Ohio 44503 For Defendants-Appellants: Atty. James R. Wise Betras, Kopp & Harshman, LLC 6630 Seville…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Patton v. DiemerOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Gliozzo v. University Urologists of Cleveland, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Lash v. MillerOhio Supreme Court · 1977
  4. First Bank of Marietta v. ClineOhio Supreme Court · 1984
  5. City of Cleveland v. Ohio Civil Rights CommissionOhio Court of Appeals · 1988

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. McAbee v. MerrymanOhio Court of Appeals · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API