Legal Opinion

Millay v. Milwaukee Automobile Mutual Insurance

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided March 5, 1963PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*333Fairchild, J.

1. Testimony as to speed. The injuries claimed by plaintiff included a strain to the cervical spine as a result of being thrown about inside his car. Plaintiff considered that in establishing the nature and extent of his injury, he was entitled to prove the force of the impact. In order to do so, he sought to show, among other things, the speed at which Russell was traveling while still on the highway. He also showed that Russell’s car left a skid mark 120 feet long on the gravel shoulder and grass lawn before reaching Millay’s car. Defendants contended that Russell’s speed…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Powers v. Allstate InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Makowski v. EhlenbachWisconsin Supreme Court · 1960
  3. McCoy v. TerhorstWisconsin Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Holtz v. FogartyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1955
  5. Myhre v. HesseyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1943

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Rausch v. BuisseWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Kinney v. SmithIdaho Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Zweifel v. Milwaukee Automobile Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Pagel v. KeesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1964
  5. City of Milwaukee v. BerryWisconsin Supreme Court · 1969

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API