Legal Opinion

HTA Ltd. Partnership v. Massachusetts Turnpike Authority

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided May 3, 2001No. 98-P-1246PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGelinas, J.

Prompted by the necessity of reducing the number of single occupant vehicles, with the complementary objective of encouraging the use of multiple occupancy vehicles on the Massachusetts Turnpike (turnpike) to satisfy certain requirements of the Federal Clean Air Act and the State implementation plan, the Massachusetts Turnpike Authority (authority) conducted numerous studies in 1993 and 1994. One of the conclusions of those studies was that a park and ride area, where commuters meet to join with others and then travel the turnpike in a single car for the remainder of their commute, was needed…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Community National Bank v. DawesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
  3. Nader v. CitronMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
  4. Slaney v. Westwood Auto, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
  5. Eyal v. Helen Broadcasting Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Perella v. Massachusetts Turnpike AuthorityMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2002
  2. Hanna v. Town of FraminghamMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2004
  3. Brogan v. BroganMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2003
  4. Clarke v. Mal Elfman's Furniture StoreMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2005
  5. Burwick v. Massachusetts Highway DepartmentMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2003

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API