Legal Opinion
Exxon Corp. v. West Texas Gathering Co.
Texas Supreme Court
Decided September 29, 1993No. D-3041PublishedCited by 118 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DOGGETT, Justice.
This ease presents questions regarding the proper interpretation of a take-or-pay gas contract and the scope of a party’s obligation to supplement discovery responses concerning expert testimony. Exxon Corp. obtained a trial court judgment for contractual damages based upon a jury verdict. The court of appeals reversed and rendered a take nothing judgment, holding both that the contract was unambiguous and that certain expert testimony regarding damages was improperly admitted. 837 S.W.2d 764. We determine that the contractual clause at issue here was ambiguous and…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Coker v. CokerTexas Supreme Court · 1983
- Sun Oil Co. (Delaware) v. MadeleyTexas Supreme Court · 1981
- Gee v. Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1989
- City of Pinehurst v. Spooner Addition Water Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1968
- Alvarado v. Farah Manufacturing Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1992
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by118 opinions
- Lenape Resources Corp. v. Tennessee Gas Pipeline Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1996
- Southwestern Energy Production Co. v. Berry-HelfandTexas Supreme Court · 2016
- Pitman v. Lightfoot, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1996
- Miller v. Kennedy & Minshew, Professional Corp.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2004
- Geodyne Energy Income Production Partnership I-E v. Newton Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 2005
113 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.