Ward v. Thompson
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
LOGSDON, C.
Plaintiff has assigned five specifications of error in her petition in error, but by reason of an entire failure to observe the requirements of Rule 26 of this court in the preparation of her brief it is difficult to determine just what propositions are relied' on for reversal. As nearly as can be determined from her brief, plaintiff’s contentions may be all embraced and considered under the single proposition that the trial court erred in sustaining the demurrer of defendants to .plaintiff’s petition.
At the first step in the consideration of this proposition it is…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Brown v. TrentSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- Welch v. FochtSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
- McIntosh v. HoltgraveSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
- Tucker v. LeonardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
- Griffin v. CulpSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Chapman v. ChapmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1984
- Cochran v. BarkusSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
- Manuel v. KiddSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
- Dill v. StevensSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
- Estes v. PickardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.