McGettigan v. Ford Motor Co.

MEMORANDUM AND OPINION

BUTLER, Chief Judge.

The following matter comes before the Court on Plaintiffs’ Motion to Remand. Docs. 5 & 6. Defendant has filed a Response in Opposition. Doe. IB. For the following reasons, the Court finds that Plaintiffs’ motion should be GRANTED.

I.BACKGROUND

Plaintiffs allege that between 1996 and 2001 Defendant Ford Motor Company manufactured automobiles with engines containing defective intake manifolds. Doc. 6 at p. 1. Plaintiffs assert that the intake manifold is defective because it is manufactured with a plastic component that cannot withstand the temperature…