Legal Opinion

Thompson v. Young, Colbourn & Co.

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided November 23, 1899PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Worcester County.

1Opinion of the CourtSchmucker, J.

On December 13th, 1894, Lewis Thompson and Isaac E. McLain, co-partners, trading as Lewis Thompson, brought an action of assumpsit by titling against James T. Young, Charles H. Colbourn, Littleton F. Hall, Charles O. Melvin, Lewis Thompson, who was also one of the plaintiffs, and William B. Allwine, co-partners, trading as Young, Colbourn & Co. All of the defendants were summoned except Thompson, who was already in Court as plaintiff, and Allwine:-

On February nth, 1895, the plaintiffs filed their declaration which contained in addition to the common money counts a count on a promissory note…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Scott v. LearyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1871
  2. Ives v. BosleyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1872
  3. Haven & White v. WakefieldIllinois Supreme Court · 1866
  4. Hamilton v. ConineCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1868
  5. Bradbury v. J. C. ParkSupreme Court of Vermont · 1855

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Speed v. BaileyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1927
  2. Noel Construction Co. v. Armored Concrete Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1913
  3. Roth v. Baltimore Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1931
  4. Keyser v. WarfieldCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1904
  5. Nelson v. CloseCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1925

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API